(RNS) — Earlier than he dies or retires, Pope Francis must make modifications within the technique of electing a brand new pope to keep away from the potential for a deadlocked conclave. Popes John Paul II and Benedict made improvements within the election course of to take care of such an eventuality, however they solely made issues worse by not anticipating the unfavorable penalties of their modifications.
The supply of the issue goes again to the normal conclave rule that it takes a two-thirds vote to elect a brand new pope.
On the optimistic facet, the two-thirds rule forces a conclave to elect as pope somebody who has extensive help, not somebody who solely has a slim majority of the cardinals behind him. Unity is a vital attribute of the church, and a consensus candidate is much less more likely to divide the church. That is particularly essential for somebody who will maintain the workplace for all times.
People are conscious of the issues that may come up within the U.S. Senate due to the supermajority (60%) required to finish a filibuster. A minority of senators can cease the Senate from performing.
Likewise in a conclave, one-third plus one of many cardinals can cease a candidate from being elected pope. In most conclaves, this forces the bulk to compromise by choosing another candidate. He will not be individuals’s first alternative, however he’s judged acceptable to most cardinals.
However in just a few conclaves, the two-thirds rule has led to a impasse.
Due to deadlocks, within the thirteenth century the papacy was vacant for a yr and a half earlier than the election of Harmless IV and for 3 and a half years earlier than the set up of Gregory X.
Within the first case the election was lastly compelled by the senate and other people of Rome, who locked up the cardinals till a pope was chosen in 1243. Within the second case, the individuals of Viterbo in 1271 not solely locked the cardinals in, they tore off the roof of the constructing and put the cardinals on a food plan of bread and water.
The identify “conclave” comes from the Latin “locked with a key.”
Such prolonged conclaves are the exception. The final conclave to go greater than 5 days was in 1831: It lasted 54 days. For the reason that thirteenth century, 29 conclaves have lasted a month or extra. Wars or civil disturbances in Rome have been the same old trigger of those prolonged interregnums. Typically, nevertheless, delays have been attributable to deadlocks among the many cardinals.
John Paul and Benedict appeared to worry an extended conclave would scandalize individuals by exhibiting divisions among the many cardinals. Within the previous days earlier than mass communications, few individuals would know or care how lengthy it took to elect a pope. At the moment, the entire world is watching because the cardinals go into conclave. An extended conclave would result in concern and hypothesis.
John Paul’s resolution was to permit the cardinals after 33 votes (34 votes if a vote occurred on the primary day) to droop the two-thirds requirement by a easy majority vote. The cardinals might then elect a brand new pope with a easy majority of the cardinals after being in conclave for lower than two weeks.
The issue with John Paul’s resolution was that it eradicated the motivation for compromise. A easy majority of the cardinals know in the event that they maintain out for the required time, they are going to have the ability to elect their candidate. Realizing this, the opposite cardinals will give in and settle for the bulk’s candidate somewhat than delay the inevitable and thus alienate the brand new pope and scandalize the general public.
The brand new rule made it unimaginable for a minority of cardinals to cease the election of Joseph Ratzinger as pope on the 2005 conclave. If this rule have been nonetheless in place at this time, it will most likely result in a brand new pope nearer to Pope Francis than a pope elected by compromise.
Earlier than leaving workplace, Benedict changed John Paul’s change with the requirement that after 33 (or 34) votes, there be a runoff between the highest two candidates. On the similar time, he reinstated the requirement that the winner should get a two-thirds majority.
Benedict’s change made issues worse as a result of it eradicated the potential for the cardinals selecting a compromise candidate. They may very well be deadlocked with no means out if neither candidate might get hold of a two-thirds majority.
It’s ironic that two conservative popes broke with custom to answer a potential downside however as an alternative created better issues for the conclave. That is precisely the error conservatives accuse liberals of constructing.
The only resolution is for Francis to return the conclave to its conventional rule requiring a two-thirds vote of the cardinals to elect a pope.
With the intention to break a potential impasse, the pope might additionally carry again the previous rule of placing the cardinals on bread and water in the event that they go on too lengthy.
In the meantime, the church may study different prospects — for instance, utilizing ranked-choice voting after 33 (or 34) inconclusive votes.
Right here, every elector lists his first, second and third decisions. If no candidate wins two-thirds of first-preference votes, the candidate with the fewest first-preference votes is eradicated. The second preferences of those that voted for him are actually forged to see if they are going to resolve the election. The method is repeated till somebody will get a two-thirds vote.
There are issues with this method. Ranked-choice voting was constructed for majority rule and will consequence within the prime two candidates nonetheless having lower than two-thirds of the vote. In that case, further ballots might happen till somebody obtained two-thirds.
The benefit of ranked voting can be to disclose individuals’s second and third decisions, which might finally result in a profitable compromise.
The lesson from John Paul’s and Benedict’s silly reforms is that tinkering with conclave guidelines requires extensive session. Popes mustn’t rely solely on a small group of advisers. If they’d issued draft proposals for churchwide dialogue, individuals might have identified the issues earlier than the modifications have been enacted.
The Vatican ought to study from these errors. No modifications must be made in church regulation with out open and clear discussions.