Christian NewsToday

Archbishop of Canterbury apologises over George Bell errors

George BellLambeth Palace Libray

The Archbishop of Canterbury has apologised over errors in his dealing with of allegations made posthumously towards the late Bishop George Bell.

In a press release, Archbishop Justin Welby mentioned it was proper that the claims had been investigated however mentioned “we didn’t handle our response to the unique allegation with the consistency, readability or accountability that meets the excessive requirements rightly demanded of us.” 

“I recognised the damage that has been carried out as a consequence, and I’ve apologised unreservedly for the errors made on this course of,” he mentioned. 

The Archbishop additionally climbed down on a earlier assertion wherein he had mentioned a “significant cloud” hung over the bishop.

The assertion has drawn sturdy criticism from Bell supporters lately, amongst them former Archbishop of Canterbury, Lord Carey, who not too long ago mentioned Bishop Bell had been unfairly “vilified” by the Church of England.

Archbishop Welby mentioned: “What I say at the moment that’s new and may have been mentioned sooner is that this: I don’t think about there to be a ‘important cloud’ over Bishop George Bell’s title.”

He additionally admitted that he was “flawed” to not have retracted the assertion sooner.

“I took that view due to the significance we rightly place on listening to those that come ahead with allegations of abuse, and the responsibility of care we owe to them. However we additionally owe an obligation of care to those that are accused,” he mentioned.

“I apologise for the damage that my refusal to retract that assertion has triggered to Bishop Bell’s surviving family, colleagues and longstanding supporters. They’ve all raised this subject, usually powerfully, and I’ve recognised my error on account of their advocacy.” 

The Archbishop of Canterbury’s assertion could be learn right here in full: 

The final 30 years have proven the significance of taking allegations of abuse severely, whether or not within the Church or some other establishment. As a society we have now awoken, albeit shamefully late, to the insidious nature of abusers and the profound harm brought on by abuse of all sorts. We have now discovered of the best way that such acts of profound evil and cruelty are dedicated in locations of belief and vulnerability. Every time we have now seemed away, made excuses, or didn’t act, we have now sinned past measure – and the Church is on a journey of thoroughgoing repentance, not simply by phrases, however in all the sensible measures we have now taken and are putting in to guard essentially the most susceptible amongst us and convey abusers to justice.

Because of this the posthumous allegations made towards Bishop George Bell had been taken severely and investigated absolutely. I don’t apologise for that, however as I’ve mentioned earlier than, we didn’t handle our response to the unique allegation with the consistency, readability or accountability that meets the excessive requirements rightly demanded of us. I recognised the damage that has been carried out as a consequence, and I’ve apologised unreservedly for the errors made on this course of.

What I say at the moment that’s new and may have been mentioned sooner is that this: I don’t think about there to be a ‘important cloud’ over Bishop George Bell’s title.

Beforehand I refused to retract that assertion and I used to be flawed to take action. I took that view due to the significance we rightly place on listening to those that come ahead with allegations of abuse, and the responsibility of care we owe to them. However we additionally owe an obligation of care to those that are accused. I apologise for the damage that my refusal to retract that assertion has triggered to Bishop Bell’s surviving family, colleagues and longstanding supporters. They’ve all raised this subject, usually powerfully, and I’ve recognised my error on account of their advocacy.

Bishop Bell was and stays one of the crucial brave, distinguished Anglican bishops of the previous century, dedicated to the peace and hope of Jesus Christ in a time of battle and warfare. The debt owed to him extends far past the Church that he served and is one which we share as a society. I’m delighted that the statue to him that was deliberate will likely be erected on the west entrance of Canterbury Cathedral, the place he served as Dean, as quickly because the in depth restore and upkeep works are full.

This doesn’t detract from my dedication to and help for victims and survivors of abuse and particularly the individual abused on this case. All allegations should be taken severely. We should stay a Church which strives for openness, transparency, care, and honesty in our dealings with sexual abuse. This contains, with paramount significance, cases the place we have now failed.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button